The widespread belief amongst the faithful that intercessory prayers
are effective at curing disease is strong. It is sufficiently strong
that it doesn’t waver when children like the Schaibles die of medical
neglect. The faithful watch children die as their bronze-age chants
fail, and feel no remorse, no doubt.
The best scientific study working with large groups on the
effectiveness of prayer remains with Benson et al (2006) [1]. The study
overcame the methodological weakness of previous studies by using proper
randomisation of subjects and ‘blind’ techniques, combined with large
sample sizes.
About 1800 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients were in the study. The patients were randomized, such that only 1/3 knew definitely they would receive intercessory prayer to assist recovery. The other 2/3rd did not know if they would receive prayer. Half of them did, half didn’t.
The study showed that prayer had no effect on complication-free recovery from CABG. The group that did know they were receiving prayer however, had a significantly higher risk of complications (59% versus 51%). It was speculated that knowing they were receiving prayer, increased their anxiety (perhaps they were sicker than they had been led to believe) and this contributed to the increased rates of complications.
There is no scientific evidence that validates the belief that prayer is effective at curing disease.
—
[1] Herbert Benson MD, Jeffery A. Dusek , Jane B. Sherwood , Peter Lam , Charles F. Bethea , William Carpenter , Sidney Levitsky , Peter C. Hill , Donald W. Clem, Jr. , Manoj K. Jain , , David Drumel , Stephen L. Kopecky , Paul S. Mueller , Dean Marek, Sue Rollins , and Patricia L. Hibberd (2006). Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer (STEP) in cardiac bypass patients: a multicenter randomized trial of uncertainty and certainty of receiving intercessory prayer. American Heart Journal 151(4): 934-942
About 1800 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients were in the study. The patients were randomized, such that only 1/3 knew definitely they would receive intercessory prayer to assist recovery. The other 2/3rd did not know if they would receive prayer. Half of them did, half didn’t.
The study showed that prayer had no effect on complication-free recovery from CABG. The group that did know they were receiving prayer however, had a significantly higher risk of complications (59% versus 51%). It was speculated that knowing they were receiving prayer, increased their anxiety (perhaps they were sicker than they had been led to believe) and this contributed to the increased rates of complications.
There is no scientific evidence that validates the belief that prayer is effective at curing disease.
—
[1] Herbert Benson MD, Jeffery A. Dusek , Jane B. Sherwood , Peter Lam , Charles F. Bethea , William Carpenter , Sidney Levitsky , Peter C. Hill , Donald W. Clem, Jr. , Manoj K. Jain , , David Drumel , Stephen L. Kopecky , Paul S. Mueller , Dean Marek, Sue Rollins , and Patricia L. Hibberd (2006). Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer (STEP) in cardiac bypass patients: a multicenter randomized trial of uncertainty and certainty of receiving intercessory prayer. American Heart Journal 151(4): 934-942
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteTo conceive of prayer as a thing of utility or as aimed at achieving healing from illness on a consistent basis is a large misperception of its purpose.
ReplyDeleteThese studies are a response to Christian claims prayer can aid healing. It's why kids are still dying horribly from easily treatable diseases, as their parents employ the bronze-age chants Christianity propagates.
DeleteFollowerofthechrist@gmail.com
ReplyDeleteFirst off, you either have only had inexperienced "Christians" evangelize to you, or you just use the inexperienced ones as an example sense you cant refute the good ones. If this is still active, or if you still check these, E-mail me.
The account is active. I don't give out my email to people I don't know or trust.
ReplyDelete